Everything about Frustration Of Purpose totally explained
In the
law of
contracts,
frustration of purpose is a defense to enforcement of the contract. Frustration of purpose occurs when an unforeseen event undermines a party's principal purpose for entering into a contract, and both parties knew of this principal purpose at the time the contract was made. Despite frequently arising as a result of government action, any third party (or even nature) can frustrate a contracting party's primary purpose for entering into the contract.
Frustration of purpose is often confused with the related doctrine of
impossibility, which is closely related. The distinction between the two is that
impossibility concerns the duties specified in the contract, whereas frustration of purpose concerns the reason a party entered into the contract. For example, suppose entrepreneur Emily leases space from landlord Larry so she can open a restaurant that only serves Tibetan Speckled Lizard meat. If the city rezones the property to forbid commercial uses, or if the property is destroyed by a tornado, then both Larry and Emily are excused from performing the contract by impossibility.
However, if the Tibetan Speckled Lizard suddenly goes extinct, then Emily may be excused from performing the contract because Larry knew her primary purpose for entering into the lease was to serve Tibetan Speckled Lizard, and that purpose has been frustrated. In the second scenario, the parties could still carry out their obligations under the lease, but one of them no longer has a reason to.
The
Restatement of Contracts, Second § 265 defines frustration of purpose:
A circumstance isn't deemed to be a "basic assumption on which the contract is made" unless the change in circumstances couldn't have been reasonably foreseen at the time the contract was made. As a result, it's rarely invoked successfully. Successful invocations usually come in waves during times of substantial tumult, such as after the passage of
Prohibition, when bars and taverns no longer had a reason for their leases, or during major wars, when demand for many consumer goods and services drops far below normal.
If successfully invoked, the contract is terminated, and the parties are left as they're at the time of the litigation.
The leading case in
English law on the subject is the famous 1903 case of
Krell v. Henry, which concerned a party who had rented a room for the purpose of watching the
coronation procession of
Edward VII. When the king fell ill, the coronation was indefinitely postponed. The hirer refused to pay for the room; the owner sued for
breach of contract and the hirer then counter-sued for the return of his £25 deposit. The court determined that the cancellation of the coronation was unforeseeable by the parties, and discharged the contract, leaving the parties as they were: the hirer lost his 1/3 deposit and the owner lost the rest of the rent.
In addition, the Court also noted that the doctrine of 'impossibility' couldn't be applied in this manner, because it wouldn't have technically been 'impossible' for the lessee (the 'renter') to take possession of the flat on that prescribed day and merely sit in front of the window and view the street where the coronation parade was to occur. The point the Court was making is this: The death of the King didn't make the execution of the contract 'impossible.' Rather, the cancellation of the parade merely
frustrated the purpose for which, both gentlemen contracted for, originally.
This concept is also called commercial frustration.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Frustration Of Purpose'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://frustration_of_purpose.totallyexplained.com">Frustration of purpose Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |